ed0e1e4d44
1979 changes to exploits/shellcodes Couchdb 1.5.0 - 'uuids' Denial of Service Apache CouchDB 1.5.0 - 'uuids' Denial of Service Beyond Remote 2.2.5.3 - Denial of Service (PoC) udisks2 2.8.0 - Denial of Service (PoC) Termite 3.4 - Denial of Service (PoC) SoftX FTP Client 3.3 - Denial of Service (PoC) Silverstripe 2.3.5 - Cross-Site Request Forgery / Open redirection SilverStripe CMS 2.3.5 - Cross-Site Request Forgery / Open Redirection Silverstripe CMS 3.0.2 - Multiple Vulnerabilities SilverStripe CMS 3.0.2 - Multiple Vulnerabilities Silverstripe CMS 2.4 - File Renaming Security Bypass SilverStripe CMS 2.4 - File Renaming Security Bypass Silverstripe CMS 2.4.5 - Multiple Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerabilities SilverStripe CMS 2.4.5 - Multiple Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerabilities Silverstripe CMS 2.4.7 - 'install.php' PHP Code Injection SilverStripe CMS 2.4.7 - 'install.php' PHP Code Injection Silverstripe Pixlr Image Editor - 'upload.php' Arbitrary File Upload SilverStripe CMS Pixlr Image Editor - 'upload.php' Arbitrary File Upload Silverstripe CMS 2.4.x - 'BackURL' Open Redirection SilverStripe CMS 2.4.x - 'BackURL' Open Redirection Silverstripe CMS - 'MemberLoginForm.php' Information Disclosure SilverStripe CMS - 'MemberLoginForm.php' Information Disclosure Silverstripe CMS - Multiple HTML Injection Vulnerabilities SilverStripe CMS - Multiple HTML Injection Vulnerabilities Apache CouchDB 1.7.0 and 2.x before 2.1.1 - Remote Privilege Escalation Apache CouchDB 1.7.0 / 2.x < 2.1.1 - Remote Privilege Escalation Monstra CMS before 3.0.4 - Cross-Site Scripting Monstra CMS < 3.0.4 - Cross-Site Scripting (2) Monstra CMS < 3.0.4 - Cross-Site Scripting Monstra CMS < 3.0.4 - Cross-Site Scripting (1) Navigate CMS 2.8 - Cross-Site Scripting Collectric CMU 1.0 - 'lang' SQL injection Joomla! Component CW Article Attachments 1.0.6 - 'id' SQL Injection LG SuperSign EZ CMS 2.5 - Remote Code Execution MyBB Visual Editor 1.8.18 - Cross-Site Scripting Joomla! Component AMGallery 1.2.3 - 'filter_category_id' SQL Injection Joomla! Component Micro Deal Factory 2.4.0 - 'id' SQL Injection RICOH Aficio MP 301 Printer - Cross-Site Scripting Joomla! Component Auction Factory 4.5.5 - 'filter_order' SQL Injection RICOH MP C6003 Printer - Cross-Site Scripting Linux/ARM - Egghunter (PWN!) + execve(_/bin/sh__ NULL_ NULL) Shellcode (28 Bytes) Linux/ARM - sigaction() Based Egghunter (PWN!) + execve(_/bin/sh__ NULL_ NULL) Shellcode (52 Bytes)
16 lines
No EOL
2.4 KiB
Text
16 lines
No EOL
2.4 KiB
Text
Both of these issues were reported to the Apport maintainers and a fix was released on 2016-12-14. The CrashDB code injection issue can be tracked with CVE-2016-9949 and the path traversal bug with CVE-2016-9950. An additional problem where arbitrary commands can be called with the “Relaunch” action is tracked by CVE-2016-9951. I’d like to thank Martin Pitt and the Ubuntu security team for getting a fix (https://bugs.launchpad.net/apport/+bug/1648806) released so quickly. They have been a pleasure to work with.
|
||
|
||
I would encourage all security researchers to audit free and open source software if they have time on their hands. Projects such as Tor, Tails, Debian and Ubuntu all need more eyes for audits which can improve the safety of the internet for everyone. There are lots of bugs out there which don’t need hardcore memory corruption exploitation skills. Logic bugs can be much more reliable than any ROP chain.
|
||
|
||
The computer security industry has a serious conflict of interest right now. There is major financial motivation for researchers to find and disclose vulnerability to exploit brokers. Many of the brokers are in the business of keeping problems unfixed. Code execution bugs are valuable. As a data point, I received an offer of more than 10,000 USD from an exploit vendor for these Apport bugs. These financial motivators are only increasing as software gets more secure and bugs become more difficult to find.
|
||
|
||
To improve security for everyone we need to find sustainable ways to incentivize researchers to find and disclose issues and to get bugs fixed. We can’t and we shouldn’t rely on researchers giving away their work for free to for-profit vendors. We will not get security like that.
|
||
|
||
Microsoft and Google have shown a good example with their vulnerability reward programs. The Internet Bug Bounty (https://internetbugbounty.org/) is also doing great work and helping to support research on critical internet software. I hope that they can continue the program and expand their scope in the future. I hope we can cooperatively build a shared and secure internet together.
|
||
|
||
Source: https://donncha.is/2016/12/compromising-ubuntu-desktop/
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Download: https://github.com/DonnchaC/ubuntu-apport-exploitation/archive/6ecfdf798f39fdd49b5929240d90a876c1e97ebb.zip
|
||
Mirror: https://github.com/offensive-security/exploitdb-bin-sploits/raw/master/bin-sploits/40937.zip |