add ch1 ex5

chapter_1/ex_5.rkt

@@ -1,3 +1,23 @@
 #lang sicp
 
-(+ 5 5)
+;Ben Bitdiddle has invented a test to determine whether the interpreter he is faced with is using applicative-order evaluation or normal-order evaluation. He defines the following two procedures:
+;(define (p) (p))
+;(define (test x y)
+;(if (= x 0) 0 y))
+;Then he evaluates the expression (test 0 (p))
+;What behavior will Ben observe with an interpreter that uses applicative-order evaluation? What behavior will he observe with an interpreter that uses normal-order evaluation? Explain your answer. 
+;(Assume that the evaluation rule for the special form if is the same whether the interpreter is using normal or applicative order: The predicate expression is evaluated first, and the result determines whether to evaluate the consequent or the alternative expression.)
+
+;--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+;Applicative-order evaluation --> evaluates the arguments of a function before applying the function itself.
+;Normal-order evaluation --> evaluates arguments only when they are needed (delay evaluation agrument until they are needed)
+
+
+(define (p) (p)) 
+(define (test x y) 
+    (if (= x 0) 0 y)
+)
+
+(test 0 3) ;if x = 0 then return x but if it is not then return y. So that, it is doing what you are asking for --> return x which is 0
+(test 1 3) ;if x != 0 then return y --> return 3
+(test 0 (p)) ;nothing happened// not evaluated yet